Calvin and the Gypped Monks

We now turn to John Calvin, another member of the elite squadron of Protestant reformers. Okay, to present them as a squadron isn’t really fair, since they didn’t agree on a whole lot (Calvin sided with Zwingli over Luther on his view of the mass, for instance, which was a sore point for the German), but it makes it sound more impressive. Calvin was actually French, which you wouldn’t know from his name, but he was actually born Jean Cauvin in 1509. He did most of his work in Geneva, a French-speaking city that would become part of Switzerland, but was active in other parts of Europe as well. And, not surprisingly, he was a very polarizing figure, with supporters regarding him as a hero of sorts, and opponents pointing out that he was a misogynist with dictatorial tendencies. Unfortunately, it seems pretty much inevitable that the people who protested tyrannical practices in the Catholic Church were all too eager to introduce their own in their reformed theologies.

John Calvin’s father, a lawyer named Gérard, originally wanted Jean to be a priest, but later changed his mind and decide his son should follow in his own footsteps and study law. John succeeded in obtaining his law degree, but remained more interested in religion, a field he was free to pursue further after Gérard’s death in 1531. He embraced Protestantism in 1533, and subsequently fled France, where Protestants were being harshly dealt with by the government. He attempted to reform the church in Geneva, but was exiled when the city authorities didn’t take too kindly to his attempts. A few years later, however, the Genevans brought him back, and he was free to institute his new organization of the church, which lacked bishops and monasteries (hence the rather strained pun in the title of this post), but had a system of pastors, elders, and deacons. He also developed the Consistory, a court made up of ministers and elders that would try citizens for religious and moral offenses. There was an ongoing struggle for power between the Consistory and the civil authorities, with the latter occasionally stepping in to make sure the religious leaders didn’t have too much power. I’ll admit to being a little confused because it seems to be agreed upon that the Consistory never had the power to sentence someone to death (excommunication was their harshest punishment, and at times they didn’t even have that), yet Calvin was able to rule in several capital cases. I have to suspect that Calvin and his church gang exercised more power than they were ever officially given. This page tells us, “Two members of the consistory, accompanied by a minister, visited every parish to see that all was well and that people could see that they were being checked on,” which really makes it sound like Geneva was effectively a police state under Calvin. The reformer was also a major supporter of witch hunts and executions, and firmly in favor of the patriarchy.

As far as his religious beliefs, Calvin adopted a lot of Zwinglian ideas, including the literal reading of the Bible. He felt that the Lord’s Supper and other sacraments were purely symbolic, and that salvation was through faith alone. The doctrine with which Calvin is most closely associated, though, is that of predestination. He didn’t invent the concept, but he fervently supported it, and it’s probably still the main point by which Calvinist churches are distinct from other Protestant denominations. I actually come from a Presbyterian family, although I don’t recall hearing much about predestination back when I went to Sunday school. I guess it’s a rather complicated concept to try to explain to kids, but in truth I don’t think the adults understand it either.

This entry was posted in Calvinism, Catholicism, Christianity, Historical Personages, History, Protestant Reformation, Religion, Switzerland and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Calvin and the Gypped Monks

  1. vilajunkie says:

    I think it’s rather ridiculous that Christianity preaches God is the only one who can judge your level of faith and obedience to the Word, but Calvin still made up the Consistory in order to prosecute laypeople for alleged, supposed crimes against God’s Word.

    Btw, excommunication may not seem like such a big deal now since hardly any churches/clergy perform it, but back then at least it was a big deal because that signified not only were you kicked out of the church, but you were kicked out of EVERY church (I think even those of different denominations). And therefore your descendants weren’t “Christians” either but had to rejoin the church on their own. Also, you were barred from entering Heaven since you were a heathen, i.e., non-Christian; I guess it depended on the denomination whether you could go into Purgatory or straight to Hell for being non-Christian regardless of your moral actions.

    Oh, and the phrase “bell, book, and candle” originally referred to the ritual of excommunication, but I guess to the fundamentalist clergy, you needed to be “exorcised” from the church just like the demons and devils.

    • Nathan says:

      Calvin’s behavior really is a good example of religious hypocrisy. If only God can judge, then the Consistory doesn’t have that right, does it? The people who claim that God is unknowable are often the same ones who seem to know exactly what God wants.

  2. Pingback: Behold, I Stand at the Door and Knox | VoVatia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s