Hearts and Minds

Since Valentine’s Day just recently ended, I suppose it would be appropriate to talk about hearts. And since this is an Oz post, I’m sure the first subject to come to anyone’s mind would be the Tin Woodman, who sought one for his tin body from the Wizard of Oz.

The Wizard had no magical powers at this point, but he still provided Nick Chopper with a plush heart stuffed with sawdust, and his friend the Scarecrow with brains made of bran mixed with pins and needles. The story makes it clear that the Tin Woodman and the Scarecrow, respectively, were already kind-hearted and intelligent, but they needed the symbols to be satisfied. In Tin Woodman, Nick explains that his heart is kind rather than loving as an excuse for not having sought out Nimmie Amee, the girl he had planned to marry before his series of axidents. Really, though, I think it’s just that, what with his new life and new friends, he really no longer had any interest in Nimmie Amee. He is certainly capable of showing love, even if he claims he isn’t.

Some of the later Oz books also play with the idea of hearts and brains. Jack Pumpkinhead uses the seeds in his pumpkins for brains, and while he’s hardly the brightest man in Oz, he has occasional flashes of insight. Dr. Pipt gave the Glass Cat brains of shiny pink stones that made her conceited, and a ruby heart that wasn’t very compassionate.

The Wizard temporarily made her more humble by giving her transparent brains at the end of Patchwork Girl, but she has the pink ones back again in Magic. By the time he brings the Patchwork Girl to life, Pipt seems to have improved on his brain-making abilities, with a set of powders that each provide a particular trait used for her brains. In Tik-Tok, the Great Jinjin Tititi-Hoochoo is said to have no heart, so that emotion and compassion will not interfere with his justice.

Moving on to Ruth Plumly Thompson’s books, the reanimated Terrybubble seems to function just fine without physical brains or a heart, but he does prefer to keep Speedy in his chest where his heart once was. When dealing with such matters, it’s not entirely clear whether the presence or absence of hearts and brains really impact these characters, or they just think they do. In the end, though, I guess it amounts to about the same thing.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Characters, Oz and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Hearts and Minds

  1. ” axidents” — Hee!

  2. vilajunkie says:

    Baum seems to like playing with the idea that those who have hearts and brains often never use them and act naively or stupidly, whereas those without hearts and brains to begin with are often more ethical and intelligent than everyone else around them.

    But speaking of brains, you forgot the Flatheads/Mountaineers–with the sort-of Communist government that makes me think of “The Sneeches” by Dr. Seuss (brains being a sign of higher status but not necessarily higher intelligence or wisdom, and therefore pointless to fight about who has more brains).

    • Nathan says:

      Some people without brains do an awful lot of talking, don’t they?

      The Flatheads aren’t exactly like the Sneetches, because apparently they were all born without brains, while the Star-Bellied Sneetches had their birthmarks throughout their lives. There’s some similarity there, though. In Living House, Edward Einhorn played with the idea of all Mountaineers having exactly the same amount of intelligence, making for a situation similar to Kurt Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron.”

      • vilajunkie says:

        “Some people without brains do an awful lot of talking, don’t they?”

        I’d say the Woggle Bug counts as an example of that. All the time in Baum’s books, but he seems to be an outright douchebag with a superiority complex (even over his own friends!) in Thompson’s books.

      • Nathan says:

        As portrayed in Land, I’d say the Wogglebug really is intelligent, just not as much as he thinks he is. It does vary from one author and book to another, though.

  3. Pingback: Plight of the Private Citizen | VoVatia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s